🔗 Share this article

The nation's bold action to ban social networking access for individuals under sixteen is creating waves internationally. Lawmakers, campaigners, and parents are monitoring intently to see if this approach will become a template for other nations.

The European Momentum

Across Europe, a rising chorus of nations are moving toward parallel restrictions.

• Denmark plans a prohibition on social media for under-15s, with the leader stating that mobile devices and apps are "taking away our youngsters' youth". Legislation could be formalized soon.
• Norway is preparing to implement a minimum age limit of 15, highlighting the need to shield the young from the "manipulative force of the AI".
• The Irish government is working on a online verification tool to verify the age and identity of social media users. The media minister have stated that an similar ban is "one of the options under consideration".
• In Spain, the president has urged lawmakers to pass a law raising the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has threatened a ban for children below 15, and a legislative committee has endorsed a similar move, alongside an overnight "digital curfew" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The authorities in The Dutch government has urged parents to block their children from social media up to the age of 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has approved a non-binding resolution demanding a ban for minors unless a parent decides otherwise is provided. While it cautions of the "habit-forming" design of these platforms, the move does not establish enforceable legislation.

"A clear age barrier is a good first step," said one parliamentarian driving the resolution.

The United Kingdom: An Evidence-Based Eye

In the UK, the administration has remained open to a possible ban, emphasizing that "nothing is discarded" but maintaining any action must be "based on conclusive evidence".

Earlier, support built behind a proposal to impose controls on social media use by minors, but it was in the end watered down. However, the administration committed to further research the matter.

Campaign organizations have expressed warnings. A prominent charity set up by the family of a teenager who died after encountering dangerous online content contends that a simple age ban might not protect children and could lead to a "cliff edge" of risk when users reach the legal age.

"This ban is a answer to the failure of the Silicon Valley to design products and services that are safe and age appropriate for minors," stated a influential child protection advocate.

The United States: A State-by-State Landscape

In the United States, action is mostly occurring at the regional level amid country-wide gridlock.

• Utah requires guardian permission for minors to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• Florida has passed a bill barring under-14s from creating accounts on social media, though it faces constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has approved a law limiting minors to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with additional time requiring a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also passed bills demanding adult authorization for under-16s to create social media accounts.

Even with bipartisan support and proposals from certain figures to follow this path, a nationwide ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Outlook

Outside of the West, other states are also taking action.

• The Malaysian government plans to prohibit social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• Brazil has increased the required age for Instagram to 16.

However, world bodies strike a more cautious tone. A major UN agency has advised that blanket prohibitions have downsides and "might have unintended consequences". The organization notes that social networks can be a "vital connection" for isolated youth and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for tech companies to invest in safety.

As this worldwide conversation evolves, the steps of Australia and several other countries indicate that states internationally are increasingly willing to stand by for platforms to act voluntarily.